<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U.S. not happy with Hunt Oil</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.iraqoilreport.com/2007/09/27/us-not-happy-with-hunt-oil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.iraqoilreport.com/2007/09/27/us-not-happy-with-hunt-oil/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hevallo</title>
		<link>http://www.iraqoilreport.com/2007/09/27/us-not-happy-with-hunt-oil/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Hevallo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iraqoilreport.com/2007/09/27/us-not-happy-with-hunt-oil/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Correction: http://hevallo.blogspot.com/2007/09/us-neo-cons-secure-kurdish-oil-but-is.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction: <a href="http://hevallo.blogspot.com/2007/09/us-neo-cons-secure-kurdish-oil-but-is.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/hevallo.blogspot.com');">http://hevallo.blogspot.com/2007/09/us-neo-cons-secure-kurdish-oil-but-is.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hevallo</title>
		<link>http://www.iraqoilreport.com/2007/09/27/us-not-happy-with-hunt-oil/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Hevallo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iraqoilreport.com/2007/09/27/us-not-happy-with-hunt-oil/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Turkey and Iraq have signed a 'deal' in regard to security but not in regard to 'hot pusuits' of PKK fighters. This was never going to be signed as the Kurds in Kurdistan do not see their brothers as 'terrorists' in the same way that Turkey does.

Secondly, the Hunt Oil deal is very interesting and I have my own take on it. I think that it will eventually be seen as a tool used by the US to push Iraq into making oil deals with bigger US companies such a Exxon Mobil etc.

I also think that it was a method to draw out any anger from the KRG in regards to putting Article 140, a referendum on the future status of Kirkuk, on the long finger.

Neo Conservative activity in Turkey over the last year has also led me to believe that it will be Turkey and not the KRG who will benefit from this Hunt Oil deal.

Please read more at:vhttp://hevallo.blogspot.com/2007/09/us-neo-cons-secure-kurdish-oil-but-is.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turkey and Iraq have signed a &#8216;deal&#8217; in regard to security but not in regard to &#8216;hot pusuits&#8217; of PKK fighters. This was never going to be signed as the Kurds in Kurdistan do not see their brothers as &#8216;terrorists&#8217; in the same way that Turkey does.</p>
<p>Secondly, the Hunt Oil deal is very interesting and I have my own take on it. I think that it will eventually be seen as a tool used by the US to push Iraq into making oil deals with bigger US companies such a Exxon Mobil etc.</p>
<p>I also think that it was a method to draw out any anger from the KRG in regards to putting Article 140, a referendum on the future status of Kirkuk, on the long finger.</p>
<p>Neo Conservative activity in Turkey over the last year has also led me to believe that it will be Turkey and not the KRG who will benefit from this Hunt Oil deal.</p>
<p>Please read more at:vhttp://hevallo.blogspot.com/2007/09/us-neo-cons-secure-kurdish-oil-but-is.html</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
